Extended Criteria Treatment for Liver Metastases With Heavy Tumour Burden

2024-512397-95-00 Therapeutic exploratory (Phase II) Temporarily halted

Start 21 May 2026 · Status Temporarily halted · 1 EU/EEA countries · 1 sites

Overview

Sponsor-declared trial summary

Phase Therapeutic exploratory (Phase II)
Status Temporarily halted
Participants planned 97
Countries 1
Sites 1

Colorectal Liver Metastases

Overall survival 2 years

Key facts

Sponsor
Oslo University Hospital HF
Participant type
Patients
Age range
18-64 years, 65+ years
Gender
Male and Female
Therapeutic area
Diseases [C] - Digestive System Diseases [C06], Analytical, Diagnostic and Therapeutic Techniques and Equipment [E] - Therapeutics [E02], Phenomena and Processes [G] - Digestive System and Oral Physiological Phenomena [G10]
Trial duration
21 May 2026 → ongoing
Decision date (initial)
2024-07-15
Transition trial
Yes
Low-intervention
No
Rare-disease indication
No
Vulnerable population
No

External identifiers

EU CT number
2024-512397-95-00
EudraCT number
2019-002388-87
ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT04898504

Trial design

CTIS Part I — objectives, methods, condition coding

Main objective

Scope: Therapy, Safety, Dose response

Overall survival 2 years

Conditions and MedDRA coding

Colorectal Liver Metastases

Eligibility criteria

Principal inclusion / exclusion criteria as submitted by sponsor

Inclusion criteria 5

  1. Primary histology: verified adenocarcinoma in colon or rectum
  2. Liver metastases: a. Not possible or feasible to resect at time of inclusion. b. Resection will require 10 % or more response in index lesions. c. And one of the following: I Insufficient response on current line chemotherapy and in need of next line systemic chemotherapy or major change of active agents as judged by treating oncologist (I, IIa, IIb). II Treatment stopped due to toxicity, and hence in need of next line systemic chemotherapy (I, IIa, IIb). III Stable disease or partial response (RECIST) is achieved following first cycle of 1st. line conventional chemotherapy (4 doses), but minimal probability of reaching liver surgery (IIc) due to any of the following: i. > 6 lesions with bi-lobar distribution and CEA > 1.000, or ii. > 10 lesions with bi-lobar distribution and at least one lesion with a diameter > 5 cm, or iii. > 15 lesions with bi-lobar distribution
  3. Chemotherapy: a. Patients must have received at least one line of systemic chemotherapy at time of inclusion in the study. Planned for next line chemotherapy (I, IIa, IIb). b. If patients have commenced next line chemotherapy, randomization can only be allowed prior to first evaluation on next line chemotherapy regimen (I, IIa, IIb). c. For IIc, patients must have undergone one cycle of systemic conventional chemotherapy and only have stable disease or partial response at first evaluation, but with a response insufficient for resection.
  4. The patient: a. Good performance status, ECOG 0 or 1. b. Satisfactory blood tests: Hb >9 g/dl, neutrophiles >1.0 (after any G-CSF), TRC >75, Bilirubin<1.5 x upper normal level, ASAT, ALAT<5 x upper normal level, Creatinine <1.25 x upper normal level. Albumin above lower normal level. c. Women of childbearing potential (WOCBP) must have a confirmed menstrual cycle and a negative highly sensitive pregnancy test prior to inclusion, or two negative pregnancy tests two weeks apart d. WOCBP must agree to use a highly effective method of contraception (see section 6.1.2) for the entire period of exposure to the IMP in the trial, plus for one menstrual cycle/30 days after the last exposure due to the genotoxic potential of the IMP e. Men that may have sexual relations with a WOCBP during the trial must agree to use a condom during intercourse for the entire period of exposure plus for one sperm cycle / 90 days after the last exposure due to the genotoxic potential of the IMP
  5. Signed informed consent and expected cooperation of the patients for treatment and follow up must be obtained and documented according to GCP, and national/local regulations.

Exclusion criteria 9

  1. Arterial anatomy not suited for HAI pump-line insertion.
  2. A primary tumour in situ that is either a a. Rectal tumour scheduled for radiation therapy with fractionation 2 Gy x 25, or b. A right-sided or transverse colonic tumour
  3. Previous or current bone or CNS metastatic disease.
  4. Patients with known intolerance or allergy to any ingredient of the IMP to be used as standard therapy for that patient
  5. Breastfeeding women
  6. Patients with a psychiatric condition that makes participation in the trial impossible or unethical
  7. Patients in a poor nutritional state, those with depressed bone marrow function or those with potentially serious infections must be excluded.
  8. Any other reason why, in the opinion of the investigators, the patient should not participate.
  9. Exclusion Excalibur I: Any of the following will preclude inclusion into Excalibur I (but not into Excalibur IIa/b/c): 1. BRAF positivity 2. Any sign of extra-hepatic metastatic disease or local recurrence on PET/CT scan, and on CT or MRI thorax/abdomen/pelvis dated within 6 weeks prior to the trial hospital MDT meeting (exception allowed for <3 resectable lung lesions all < 15mm). 3. Liver lesion >10cm 4. Patient BMI > 30 5. Any previous non-colorectal malignancy within latest five years with the exception of basal cell carcinoma of the skin. 6. Age > 70 years 7. Liver metastatic ingrowth to the diaphragm determined by CT-scan and/or MRI/or ultrasound 8. Any primary tumour in situ

Endpoints

Primary and secondary outcome measures (English text)

Primary endpoints 1

  1. Overall Survival at two years

Secondary endpoints 4

  1. Progression-free survival
  2. Overall survival at 5 years
  3. Resection/transplantation rate
  4. Quality of life

Investigational products

Investigational medicinal products (IMPs), comparators, placebo, auxiliary

Test 5

Floxuridine

PRD10652670 · Product

Active substance
Floxuridine
Substance synonyms
2'-DEOXY-5-FLUOROURIDINE, 5-FLUORO-2'-DEOXYURIDINE
Pharmaceutical form
POWDER FOR SOLUTION FOR INJECTION
Route of administration
CONCENTRATE FOR SOLUTION FOR INFUSION
Max daily dose
0.12 mg/kg milligram(s)/kilogram
Max total dose
1.68 mg/kg milligram(s)/kilogram
Max treatment duration
2 Week(s)
Authorisation status
Not Authorised
MA holder
OSLO UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL
Paediatric formulation
No
Orphan designation
No

Heparin

SUB02475MIG · Substance

Active substance
Heparin
Pharmaceutical form
INTRAVENOUS INFUSION
Route of administration
CONCENTRATE FOR SOLUTION FOR INFUSION
Max daily dose
1500 IU international unit(s)
Max total dose
21000
Max treatment duration
2 Week(s)
Authorisation status
Authorised
ATC code
- — -
Marketing authorisation
-
Paediatric formulation
No
Orphan designation
No
Modified vs. Marketing Authorisation
No

Heparin

SCP100373670 · ATC

Active substance
Heparin
Substance synonyms
HEPARIINI, HEPARINUM
Route of administration
CONCENTRATE FOR SOLUTION FOR INFUSION
Max daily dose
1500 U unit(s)
Max total dose
21000
Max treatment duration
14 Day(s)
Authorisation status
Authorised
ATC code
B01AB01 — HEPARIN
Marketing authorisation
-
Paediatric formulation
No
Orphan designation
No
Modified vs. Marketing Authorisation
No

Dexamethasone Acetate

SCP10332310 · ATC

Active substance
Dexamethasone Acetate
Route of administration
CONCENTRATE FOR SOLUTION FOR INFUSION
Max daily dose
1.1 mg milligram(s)
Max total dose
15 mg milligram(s)
Max treatment duration
14 Day(s)
Authorisation status
Authorised
ATC code
H02AB02 — DEXAMETHASONE
Marketing authorisation
-
Paediatric formulation
No
Orphan designation
No
Modified vs. Marketing Authorisation
No

Dexamethasone Sodium Phosphate

SUB01615MIG · Substance

Active substance
Dexamethasone Sodium Phosphate
Pharmaceutical form
SOLUTION FOR INJECTION
Route of administration
CONCENTRATE FOR SOLUTION FOR INFUSION
Max daily dose
1 mg milligram(s)
Max total dose
15 mg milligram(s)
Max treatment duration
2 Week(s)
Authorisation status
Authorised
ATC code
- — -
Marketing authorisation
-
Paediatric formulation
No
Orphan designation
No
Modified vs. Marketing Authorisation
No

Sponsors and contacts

Sponsor organisations, regulatory contacts, third parties

Oslo University Hospital HF

Sponsor organisation
Oslo University Hospital HF
Address
Taarnbygget, Kirkeveien 166 Kirkeveien 166
City
Oslo
Postcode
0450
Country
Norway

Scientific contact point

Organisation
Oslo University Hospital HF
Contact name
Kristoffer Lassen

Public contact point

Organisation
Oslo University Hospital HF
Contact name
Kristoffer Lassen

Locations

1 EU/EEA country · 1 investigational sites

By country

CountryMS statusPlanned subjectsSites
Norway Temporarily halted 97 1
Rest of world 0

Investigational sites

Norway

1 site · Temporarily halted
Oslo University Hospital HF
HPB surgery, Taarnbygget, Kirkeveien 166, Oslo

Country notifications

Trial-start, recruitment-start, end and early-termination notifications submitted per Member State

Country Trial startTrial end Recruitment startRecruitment end Early termination
Norway 2021-05-20 2024-07-15 2024-09-17

Oversight and notifications

Regulatory notifications under CTR Articles 38, 52, 53, 54 and 77

Temporary halts 2 · Art. 38 CTR

Temporary halt TH-135090

Halt date
2024-09-17
Member states concerned
Norway
Publication date
2026-05-21
Reason
Safety related (clinical or pre-clinical results)
Explanation
See documents submitted in September 2024 for more information.
As of April 2025 there are no longer any patients in the Excalibur trial receiving Floxuridine by the pump.
Follow-up measures
See documents submitted in September 2024. All systemic doses of 5-FU and most other systemic chemotherapy was reduced. As of September 2024 there where still three patients receving Floxuridine by the pump. By April 2025 this number was zero.
Benefit-risk balance changed
Yes
Treatment stopped
Yes

Temporary halt TH-46746

Halt date
2024-09-17
Planned restart
2024-10-08
Member states concerned
Norway
Publication date
2024-09-17
Reason
Safety related (clinical or pre-clinical results)
Explanation
Patients included in the Excalibur randomised trial who are in the intervention group receive Floxuridine intra-arterially via pump and catheter (see protocol). Floxuridine has a near complete first-pass metabolism in the liver and systemic effects are reported to be absolutely minimal. As a result, high doses can be used directly into the liver. As these patients have extensive cancers, they are also treated concomitantly with systemic 5FU-based chemotherapy regimens.
Enterocolitis is a well described adverse effect of several systemic chemotherapy regimens. Over the years we have seen some cases of moderate and even very serious enterocolitis in patients in the intervention groups. Two patients have been treated in the ICU. As we had no reason at the time to suspect any interaction with Floxuridine provided by pump, we viewed these complications as a consequence of the systemic (standard) treatment, but Floxuridine was always removed from the pump in these instances.
Two weeks ago, we concluded that the incidence and severity of enterocolitis in the intervention group was worryingly high. We consulted pharmacologists dedicated to such situations and asked for expedite review. On 12 September they returned with a hypothesis for a possible cause-effect relationship between un-reduced doses of systemic fluouracil (5FU) and pump administered floxuridine. At that date we concluded that previous cases of enterocolitis were not to be regarded as caused by the standard treatment alone
Follow-up measures
We decided on 5 September (based on suspicion) an immediate reduction in doses of systemic 5FU to 80% and that initial bolus should be omitted in all patients receiving floxuridine by pump. This was corroborated by the 12 September pharmacology report. This reduction is in line with the current US EA-2222/pump protocol (inclusion commenced March 20249 that we had mailed from their P.I. on 16 September.
All participating oncologists are being informed that systemic 5FU should be administered without bolus and in 80% doses in patients under active Floxuridine treatment – presently three patients in total. One patient is presently under treatment from enterocolitis and not receiving any further chemotherapy until this has resolved. As before, pumps are emptied of Floxuridine in any case of diarrhoea.
Trial inclusion is temporarily halted on 17 September as reports are submitted. The protocol will be updated and new approval solicited.
Benefit-risk balance changed
Yes
Treatment stopped
No

Urgent safety measures 1 · Art. 54 CTR

Urgent safety measure US-46743

Event date
2024-09-12
Submission date
2024-09-17
In response to
SUSAR
Member states affected
Norway
Event description
Patients included in the Excalibur randomised trial who are in the intervention group receive Floxuridine intra-arterially via pump and catheter (see protocol). Floxuridine has a near complete first-pass metabolism in the liver and systemic effects are reported to be absolutely minimal. As a result, high doses can be used directly into the liver. As these patients have extensive cancers, they are also treated concomitantly with systemic 5FU-based chemotherapy regimens.
Enterocolitis is a well described adverse effect of several systemic chemotherapy regimens. Over the years we have seen some cases of moderate and even very serious enterocolitis in patients in the intervention groups. Two patients have been treated in the ICU. As we had no reason at the time to suspect any interaction with Floxuridine provided by pump, we viewed these complications as a consequence of the systemic (standard) treatment, but Floxuridine was always removed from the pump in these instances.
Two weeks ago, we concluded that the incidence and severity of enterocolitis in the intervention group was worryingly high. We consulted pharmacologists dedicated to such situations and asked for expedite review. On 12 September they returned with a hypothesis for a possible cause-effect relationship between un-reduced doses of systemic fluouracil (5FU) and pump administered floxuridine. At that date we concluded that previous cases of enterocolitis were not to be regarded as caused by the standard treatment alone.
Measures taken
We decided on 5 September (based on suspicion) an immediate reduction in doses of systemic 5FU to 80% and that initial bolus should be omitted in all patients receiving floxuridine by pump. This was corroborated by the 12 September pharmacology report. This reduction is in line with the current US EA-2222/pump protocol (inclusion commenced March 20249 that we had mailed from their P.I. on 16 September.
All participating oncologists are being informed that systemic 5FU should be administered without bolus and in 80% doses in patients under active Floxuridine treatment – presently three patients in total. One patient is presently under treatment from enterocolitis and not receiving any further chemotherapy until this has resolved. As before, pumps are emptied of Floxuridine in any case of diarrhoea.
Trial inclusion is temporarily halted on 17 September as reports are submitted. The protocol will be updated and new approval solicited.

Results and documents

Annex IV summary of results, Annex V layperson summary, and all documents registered in CTIS for this trial

Documents 4 files

Public protocol annexes, IB summaries, regulatory submissions and post-authorisation documents registered in CTIS.

TypeTitleVersion
Protocol (for publication) D1_Protocol 2024-512397-95-00 7.0
Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) (for publication) E2_SmPC Dexamethasone 1
Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) (for publication) E2_SmPC FUDR 1
Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) (for publication) E2_SmPC HEPARIN 1

Application history

2 submissions — initial application plus substantial / non-substantial modifications

#TypeCodeSubmittedReference MSConclusionDecision date
1 INITIAL IN 2024-06-14 Norway Acceptable
2024-07-12
2024-07-15
2 SUBSTANTIAL MODIFICATION SM-1 2026-05-18 Norway Acceptable
2026-05-20
2026-05-20